超声电导仪治疗慢性疼痛的临床观察  

Treatment of chronic pain with ultrasound conductimeter: a clinical observation

作　　者：韩秀兰[1] 王楚怀[1] 赖建洋[1] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学附属第一医院黄埔院区康复医学科,广东,广州,510700 中山大学附属第一医院黄埔院区康复医学科,广东,广州,510700 中山大学附属第一医院黄埔院区康复医学科,广东,广州,510700

出　　处：《现代医学仪器与应用》2008年第3期18-20,共3页

摘　　要：目的 观察超声电导仪对颈椎病、肩周炎、膝关节炎、网球肘等肌肉骨关疾病所致慢性疼痛的治疗效果. 方法 67例上述患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,治疗组33例,对照组34例.治疗组采用诺亚同舟YZB/京0044-2002超声电导仪治疗,对照组采用常规物理治疗,包括中频电、超短波、感应电治疗、TENS等.两组均采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)及临床疗效评定法进行评估. 结果 治疗后治疗组疼痛缓解及功能改善均明显优于对照组.VAS评分,治疗后治疗组与对照组差异有显著性(P<0.01).治疗组治愈率69.69%,好转率100%,对照组治愈率35.29%,好转率88.24%(P<0.01). 结论 超声电导仪对慢性疼痛的疗效确切,应用于临床具有高效、快速的优点.值得推广.Objective To observe the effects of ultrasound conductimeter treatment on patients with chronic pain, the cases included Cervical spondylotic, scapulohumeral periarthritis, knee arthritis, tennis elbow etc. Methods 67 patients complained with chronic pain were randomly divided into treatment group (33 patients) and control group (34 patients). Treatment group used ultrasound conductimeter treatment, control group used general physical therapy, including intermediate frequency treatment, ultrashort wave treatment, faradize treatment, TENS, etc. All patients were assessed with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and clinic curative effect assessment. Results After treatment, it showed sufficient differences between the two groups, treatment group showed a better effect than that in control group. There was a significant lower VAS score in treatment group (P< 0.01). In treatment group recovery rate is 69.69% and improvement rate 100%, in control group recovery rate is 35.29% and improvement rate 88.24% (P<0.01). Conclusion Ultrasound conductimeter therapy has significant therapeutic effects on patients with chronic pain, it is valuable for widely used in clinic.

关 键 词：超声电导仪 慢性疼痛 

分 类 号：R197.3[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]