检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴宏娟[1]
出 处:《华文文学》2009年第3期58-63,共6页Literatures in Chinese
基 金:国家社科基金 项目编号为:06CZW003;霍英东教育基金会高等院校青年教师基金项目"当代海外华人学者批评理论研究"(项目编号为:101099)
摘 要:着眼于张爱玲研究中的意识与技巧之争,从张爱玲的女性写作切入,探讨海内外学者在意识与技巧关系问题上的差异:大陆学者多是就意识而谈意识,将张爱玲甘于"第二性"弱者的女性立场,以"补充"的姿态"纳入"中国新文学女性文学传统;海外华人学者在重视技巧的同时,将技巧联系意识,借张爱玲的女性写作技巧对中国男性主流文学传统进行破坏和颠覆。在双方文学观念冲突的背后,则是其各自文学研究方法——社会历史批评与文化研究方法的历史落差。With the focus on the rivalry between idea and writing technique in Eileen Chang Studies,this thesis studies Chang's feminist writings so as to probe into the divergence between scholars home and abroad upon the relationship between idea and technique:Most scholars in Mainland pay much attention to idea and tend to incorporate Chang's inferior position of the'second sex'as a supplement into the feminist literary tradition of Chinese New Literature;Besides emphasizing technique,overseas Chinese scholars associate technique with idea by interpreting Chang's feminist writings as subversive acts to undermine Chinese androcentric literary tradition.Behind this divergence of literary view is,actually,the historical gap between their literary approaches:socio-historical criticism and cultural studies.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3