检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:任会杰[1]
出 处:《牡丹江教育学院学报》2008年第4期149-150,共2页Journal of Mudanjiang College of Education
摘 要:当下,我国对宽严相济的刑事政策的研究正处在春意盎然的发展势头,余罪自首制度作为其典型代表之一,整个学界和司法界都以各自的角度对其进行了诠释。同时它也面临着自身理论自足性的质疑和假定,并在不断完善和发展中前行。本文将一起案例作为出发点,从理论和实践的碰撞、余罪自首的成立条件和对其发展趋势的追求三个层次上来对余罪自首制度作出粗浅的省思,以求教于刑法学界同仁。At present,the research into criminal policies is developing very fast in China.Surplus crime self-incrimination system,as a typical representation,has been explained in different ways in the whole academic circle and law circle.And it has limitations and presupposition in theory.It is advancing with constant development and perfection.Started with a case,surplus crime self-incrimination system is discussed from the conflict between theory and practice,conditions to verification crime,the tendency of development.I hope to get help from scholars in law circle.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15