检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版)》2008年第4期294-299,共6页Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition)
基 金:国家自然科学基金(30371053);国家杰出青年基金(30125034)
摘 要:目的比较实时定量PCR法与COBAS Amplicor法定量检测血清HBV DNA。方法自国家药品生物制品鉴定所与国家临检中心随机选取158例临床血清标本,比较了两种检测方法的线性范围、准确度、重复性、实验时间及成本。结果实时定量PCR的批内差和批间差分别为0.3%~3.8%和1.4%~8.1%。实时定量PCR法与COBAS AMPLICOR法具有良好的相关性(r=0.948),实时定量PCR法成本低且检测范围更宽。结论实时定量PCR是监测慢性乙型肝炎患者HBV DNA水平的有效方法。Objective To compare the clinical feature of real-time PCR assay with COBAS Amplicor HBV Monitor test for quantitation of HBV DNA in serum samples.Methods One hundred and fifty-eight serum samples were chosen from the Chinese National Institute for the control of pharmaceutical and biological products and the National Center for clinical laboratories of China.The linearity,accuracy,reproducibility,assay time and costs of real-time PCR were evaluated and compared with those of the Cobas Amplicor test.Results The intra-assay and inter-assay variations of real-time PCR ranged from 0.3% to 3.8% and 1.4% to 8.1%,respectively.The HBV DNA levels measured by real-time PCR correlated very well with those obtained with COBAS Amplicor test (r=0.948).Real-time PCR HBV DNA kit was much cheaper and had a wider examination area.Conclusions Real-time PCR assay is an excellent tool for monitoring HBV DNA levels in patients with chronic hepatitis B.
关 键 词:COBASAmplicor 乙型肝炎病毒 实时定量PCR
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222