检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国科学院广州地球化学研究所有机地球化学国家重点实验室,广东广州510640 [2]中国科学院研究生院,北京100039 [3]广州市自来水公司,广东广州510600
出 处:《供水技术》2008年第6期36-38,共3页Water Technology
摘 要:以乐果为目标化合物,探讨了活性炭吸附、活性炭吸附—混凝沉淀工艺以及石灰碱解—活性炭吸附—混凝沉淀三种工艺对乐果的去除效果。结果表明,乐果的去除效果随着活性炭投加量与吸附时间的增加而增加,采用活性炭吸附—常规混凝沉淀工艺对乐果的去除效果要略好于单独采用活性炭吸附,但这两种工艺都不能有效去除水中的乐果。采用石灰碱解—活性炭吸附—混凝沉淀工艺时,乐果的去除率随着石灰碱解的pH值升高而增加。当原水乐果含量为0.182mg/L,用石灰调节原水pH值为9,投加30mg/L活性炭吸附20min后,去除率达89.9%,沉淀出水乐果浓度为0.0184mg/L,满足标准要求。Removal efficiencies of Rogor were investigated with activated carbon adsorption,activated carbon adsorption-coagulation and sedimentation,lime alkaline hydrolysis-activated carbon adsorption-coagulation and sedimentation.The result showed that removal efficiencies of Rogor increased with activated carbon dosage and adsorption time.Activated carbon adsorption-conventional coagulation and sedimentation was better than activated carbon adsorption,but both of them were not very effective.Removal rate of Rogor increased with pH rising of lime by lime alkaline hydrolysis-activated carbon adsorption-coagulation and sedimentation.Removal rate of Rogor could be 89.9% with 30 mg/L activated carbon adsorption for 20 min when the concentration of Rogor was 0.182 mg/L and pH of raw water was adjusted to 9,the concentration of Rogor after sedimentation was 0.018 4 mg/L,and it could meet the requirement of standards.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.27.94