产业组织理论的主要流派与近期进展  

Main Schools of Industrial Organization Theory and Its New Development

作　　者：董艳华[1] 荣朝和[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京交通大学经济管理学院,北京100044

出　　处：《北京交通大学学报（社会科学版）》2003年第4期10-15,共6页Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家自然科学基金资助项目(G0 3 0 6-70 2 73 0 0 1)

摘　　要：产业组织理论以企业间的垄断与竞争关系研究为核心 ,并逐渐扩展到对企业内部组织制度 ,以及企业与政府之间关系的研究。本文分析了发达资本主义国家不同经济阶段产业组织理论的发展和产业组织政策 ,并对产业组织理论的主要流派 ,包括哈佛学派、芝加哥学派、可竞争理论及新产业组织理论等的观点、研究方法和代表人物进行了介绍与评价 ,指出不同理论之间既有批判又有继承 ,并在不同的经济背景下分别成为各国政府产业组织政策的主要理论工具。作者认为 ,在研究方法上重新重视经验研究 ,在研究对象上立足于全球化和知识经济背景将是产业组织理论未来发展的主要趋势。此外 ,网络型基础产业组织理论框架的建立对于这些行业的改革具有现实而紧迫的意义。Industrial Organization Theory (IO Theory) had been focused on inter enterprises relationships, especially on monopoly and competition, and gradually extended to inner enterprise institutions, as well as enterprise_government relationships. The paper analyzes the main developments of IO Theory and the industrial organization policy in developed nations at different historical stages. It shows the viewpoints, methodology, and representatives of various IO theories schools, such as the Harvard School, the Chicago School, Contestable Market Theory and the New IO theory. Although disapprovals existed among the various main schools of Industrial Organization Theory, they also inherited each other, and became main theoretical support for governments' industrial organization policy under different economy background respectively. According to the authors, re_attaching importance to empirical study and reshaping the theory framework under globalization and knowledge economy will be breakthroughs of IO theory. Besides, further organization study on network infrastructure industries will be realistic and urgent to such industrial reforms.

关 键 词：产业组织理论 流派 SCP分析框架 垄断 竞争 产业政策 网络型基础产业 

分 类 号：F014[经济管理—政治经济学]