检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine》2000年第3期181-183,共3页中国结合医学杂志(英文版)
摘 要:Objective: To study the effect and side-effects of Duodongning (DDN), a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) granule in treating attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Methods: Double blind method was used to compare DDN with ritalin for ADHD in clinical practice from December 1995 to December 1996. The total number of cases was 70. Results: There were 37 cases in DDN group, with 17 cases (45.9%) markedly effective, 16 cases (43.2%) effective, the Conners hyperactive index (HI) 2.01±0.83 (before treatment), 1.17±0.76 (after 4 weeks' treatment); and there were 33 cases in the ritalin group, with 15 cases (45.5%) markedly effective, 14 cases (42.4%) effective, HI 2.07±0.91 (before treatment), 1.47±0.79 (after 4 weeks' treatment). Insignificant difference existed between the effectiveness in these 2 groups (P>0.05). The chief side-effects were 3 cases (8.1%) of anorexia in DDN group, and 7 cases (21.2%) in ritalin group. Conclusion: The effect of DDN is not significantly different from that of ritalin, and the side-effects in ritalin group were more than those in DDN group. Objective: To study the effect and side-effects of Duodongning (DDN), a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) granule in treating attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Methods: Double blind method was used to compare DDN with ritalin for ADHD in clinical practice from December 1995 to December 1996. The total number of cases was 70. Results: There were 37 cases in DDN group, with 17 cases (45.9%) markedly effective, 16 cases (43.2%) effective, the Conners hyperactive index (HI) 2.01±0.83 (before treatment), 1.17±0.76 (after 4 weeks' treatment); and there were 33 cases in the ritalin group, with 15 cases (45.5%) markedly effective, 14 cases (42.4%) effective, HI 2.07±0.91 (before treatment), 1.47±0.79 (after 4 weeks' treatment). Insignificant difference existed between the effectiveness in these 2 groups (P>0.05). The chief side-effects were 3 cases (8.1%) of anorexia in DDN group, and 7 cases (21.2%) in ritalin group. Conclusion: The effect of DDN is not significantly different from that of ritalin, and the side-effects in ritalin group were more than those in DDN group.
关 键 词:attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder Duoduoning RITALIN
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200