意思自治精神与法官的角色  

Intention Autonomy Spirit and the Role of the Judge

作　　者：廖勇[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南科技大学法学院,四川绵阳621010

出　　处：《河南司法警官职业学院学报》2005年第1期103-105,共3页Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College

摘　　要：意思自治精神一般要求法官在民事纠纷审判过程中原则上只是在双方意见不一致而提出请求裁定申请时才进行介入。但在我国民事审判中,当事人意思自治精神却被限制在十分狭小的领域,法庭投入了较大的热情,积极调查取证、询问证人,去发现案件事实,甚至不惜违背作为现代审判基础的不告不理原则。笔者针对最高人民法院的《若干规定》,建议在我国民事审判中明确规定“积极否认事实的自白”以及“权利自白”的法律效力。The intention autonomy spirit ask the judge to interrupt in the civil dispute only when the two parties disagree with each other. However, in China civil case, the spirit is restricted in narrow space, the court is interested in investigating the case and examinating the plaintiff so as to research for the fact. In accordance with the concerned regulations made by the Supreme People's Court, this paper suggest defining the legal effect of rights confession and facts regretted confession.

关 键 词：意思自治 自白事实 权利自白 法官角色 

分 类 号：DF0[政治法律—法学理论]