对我国陪审制的理性思考——从比较两大法系国家陪审制生存条件的视角  

On the Thinking about Chinese System of Assessors

作　　者：罗智勇[1] 冯浩[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南大学法学院

出　　处：《时代法学》2004年第3期58-63,共6页Presentday Law Science

摘　　要：由于法律传统和人文环境的不同 ,陪审制在英美法系国家与大陆法系国家以不同的形式存在。英美法系国家实行的是陪审团制 ,而包括我国在内的大陆法系国家实行的则是参审制。我国不具备陪审团制生存的条件 ,而参审制式的陪审制的施行绩效又不如人意。面对这一现实状况 ,我们不能再进行简单的选择和取舍 ,而应该进行制度的重新架构。Because of the difference of legal tradition and humanism, jury system shows different form in anglo-american law system and continental law system. Different to the jury system of anglo-american law system, people only act as an assessor in a law case in the continental law system which Chinese style belongs to. Jury system couldn't find suitable environment in Chinese legal system, but the performance of Chinese jury system-acting as an assessor in a law case doesn't satisfied. Facing this reality, we couldn't only make simple choice but rebuild the construction of the Chinese jury system.

关 键 词：陪审制 陪审团制 参审制 应然选择 

分 类 号：D9[政治法律—法学]