检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:覃一珏[1] 覃光地[1] 杨嘉珍[1] 陈希[1] 李云燕[1] 张大国[1] 唐阿方[1]
机构地区:[1]广西壮族自治区人民医院中医科,广西南宁530021
出 处:《中国医药导报》2010年第23期54-56,共3页China Medical Herald
摘 要:目的:观察骶管注射加穴位埋线法与常规治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效差异。方法:将160例患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,各80例。治疗组采用骶管注射加羊肠线穴位埋线,骶管注射为每周1次,1次为1个疗程,一般注射2次,必要时1周后再注射1次;穴位埋线为每周1次,3次为1个疗程。对照组采用牵引推拿配合中药内服,每天1次,1周为1个疗程,共3个疗程。结果:治疗3个疗程后,治疗组JOA评分及总有效率均优于对照组(均P<0.05)。结论:骶管注射加穴位埋线法治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效较好,值得临床应用。Objective:To observe the efficacy difference of caudal injection and acupuncture point embedding in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.Methods:160 patients were randomly divided into treatment group and control group,each of 80 cases.Treatment group were caudal injection and catgut implantation,caudal injection to 1 week,1 time for a course,usually injected 2 times,if necessary,1 time after injection of 1 week;acupoint catgut embedding for the week 1,3 times for one course.The control group,traction and massage and Chinese Herbs,1 time a day,1 week for a course,a total of 3 courses.Results:After 3 courses of treatment,in the treatment group,JOA score and the total effective was better than that of the control group (all P<0.05).Conclusion:Caudal injection and effect of acupoint catgut embedding method is better,it’s worthy of clinical use.
分 类 号:R246[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117