专利申请中的“充分披露”的判断基础  

The Elements for Assessing "Sufficiency of Disclosure" in Patent Application

作　　者：吕炳斌[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学法学院,上海200438 [2]上海商学院商法研究所,上海201400

出　　处：《大连理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2011年第1期100-104,共5页Journal of Dalian University of Technology(Social Sciences)

基　　金：上海市教委重点学科建设项目(J52001)

摘　　要：披露是专利制度的最终目的、首要功能和核心问题。在以往学说中,对于"充分披露"的判断基础的认识并不统一,对"充分披露"的判断基础的明确已成为一种必要。从实证角度考察,美国法院判例和《专利审查程序指南》以及《欧洲专利局审查指南》已对发明的披露的判断基础进行了明确,另外,正在谈判中的《实体专利法条约》也企图对"充分披露"的判断基础进行协调。我国有必要明确专利申请中的"充分披露"的判断基础,首先可以在《专利审查指南》中明确"充分披露"的判断基础包括说明书、权利要求书及附图,待条件成熟时将之上升为行政法规或法律中的规定,这也是顺应实体专利法的国际协调趋势。Disclosure is the ultimate goal,primary function and the core issue of patent system.In the existing academic literature,there is inconsistency with the elements for determination of sufficiency of disclosure,thus it is necessary to clarify this issue.From a practical viewpoint,case laws and Manual of Patent Examining Procedure of the U.S and Guidelines for Examination in the European Patent Office has stipulated explicitly the elements for assessing sufficiency of disclosure.The Substantive Patent Law Treaty under international negotiation has also aimed to harmonize this issue.China will make it necessary to clarify the elements for determination of sufficiency of disclosure in patent application,first of all,by working out the elements for assessment including specification,claims and drawings in the examination guidelines.Under well-considered conditions,such a provision can be written into the administrative regulation or law,which is in conformity to the trend of international harmonization of patent law.

关 键 词：专利 充分披露 判断基础 公开 

分 类 号：C55[社会学]