检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王春艳[1]
机构地区:[1]内蒙古财经学院法学系,内蒙古呼和浩特010070
出 处:《内蒙古财经学院学报(综合版)》2011年第1期124-127,共4页Journal of inner Mongolia finance and economics college
摘 要:民事执行程序性救济,是民事执行救济制度的类型之一,世界上许多国家和地区的立法中对其均有规定,我国2007年《民事诉讼法》将民事执行救济制度作为修改的重点,其增设了对程序事项的救济,但仍有诸多不够详尽、完善之处。实践中,执行难,执行乱的现实依然没有得到彻底的解决,民事执行救济落实得不到位。为此,本文在探讨了民事执行程序性救济的基本理论,分析了我国现行民事执行程序性救济制度的现状和不足之后,提出我国民事执行程序性救济制度的完善设想。Civil executive procedural remedy is one type of civil executive remedy system.It has been regulated in legislations of many countries and areas in the world.It was the modification focus of Civil Procedural Law in 2007.Although the remedy of procedural matter has been added,there are still many imperfect ones.In practice,the reality of difficult and disordered executions can not be solved completely and the civil executive remedy can not be fulfilled completely.Therefore,this paper explores the basic theories of civil executive procedural remedy,analyses the present situation and defects of Chinese civil executive procedural remedy system,puts forward assumption on perfecting it.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28