律师伪证罪的存废之争  

The Perjury of Attorney: Existence or Abolishment

作　　者：王永杰[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律学院,上海200042

出　　处：《复旦学报（社会科学版）》2011年第4期111-118,134,共9页Fudan Journal（Social Sciences）

基　　金：2010年教育部一般项目"辩护人伪造证据罪相关问题研究"(项目批准号:10LJA820108)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：理论界对是否应当保留律师伪证罪的争论,主要有否定说和肯定说两种不同的观点。在我国确立律师伪证罪具有必要性,尽管该罪在司法实践中存在很多问题,但并不能因此就取消《刑法》第306条规定的辩护人与诉讼代理人毁灭证据、伪造证据、妨害作证罪。针对律师伪证罪在实践中存在的具体问题,应该明确适用《刑法》第306条的基本原则,统一司法机关工作人员实施该条的指导思想。针对《刑法》第306条存在的具体问题,应当从实体和程序两方面进行完善。There are different opinions on whether the crime of perjury of attorney should be abolished.It's necessary to keep the crime of perjury of attorney,though there are many problems within the judicial practice.We shouldn't abolish the crime of perjury of attorney promulgated by the article 306 of the Chinese Criminal Law simply because of those problems.Facing with the problems emerged in judicial practice,we need to clarify the basic principle when applying the article 306 and achieve common understanding among the staff of judicial organs.We need to improve both from substantial and procedural perspectives to solve all the problems concerning the article 306.

关 键 词：律师伪证罪 存废 改造 原则 措施 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]