检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王丽纯[1] 张晓菲[1] 胡文利[1] 陈雷[1] 欧海燕[1] 寇秋野[1]
机构地区:[1]中山大学附属第六医院ICU,广州510655
出 处:《中华临床医师杂志(电子版)》2011年第24期7291-7294,共4页Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition)
摘 要:目的探讨平均血糖和血糖波动与重症监护病房(ICU)危重症患者预后的相关性。方法回顾性分析2009年1月至2010年12月入重症监护病房且期间测血糖不少于10次的184例ICU危重症患者的病例资料,根据预后情况分为死亡组(n=63)与存活组(n=121),比较两组间初始血糖(GluAdm)、平均血糖(GluMV)、血糖标准差(GluSD)、血糖变异系数(GluCV)的差异,应用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)评价GluAdm、GluMV、GluSD、GluCV与ICU患者病死率相关性。结果死亡组患者GluAdm、GluSD及GluCV均明显高于存活组[GluAdm(10.2±4.7)mmol/Lvs.(9.6±3.0)mmol/L,GluSD(3.61±1.68)mmol/Lvs.(2.52±0.84)mmol/L,GluCV0.328±0.120vs.0.245±0.061,P均<0.05],GluMV在存活组与死亡组间无统计学差异。GluCV的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.710±0.044,明显高于GluSD、GluAdm、GluMV的AUC(分别为0.692±0.045、0.570±0.046和0.506±0.047,P均<0.05)。结论危重症患者血糖波动与病死率密切相关,GluCV较GluSD、GluAdm、GluMV对重症患者住院期间死亡的预测更为精确。Objective To determine the correlation between glucose variability and mortality in critical ill patients.Methods A retrospective study involving 184 patients admitted to department of general intensive care unit(ICU)in the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2009 to December 2010,for whom at least 10 glucose measurements were available.According to the patients'prognosis,critically ill patients were divided into nonsurvivors(63 cases)and survivors(121 cases),monitored in terms of their initial blood glucose(GluAdm),the mean blood glucose value(GluMV),standard deviation of blood glucose(GluSD),coefficient of variation glucose(GluCV).Then GluAdm,GluMV,GluSD and GluCV were compared between survivors and nonsurvivors,and the receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC curve)was applied to evaluate the association between blood glucose variability and prognosis.Results The levels of GluAdm,GluSD and GluCV of nonsurvivors were higher than those of survivors[GluAdm:(10.2±4.7)mmol/L vs.(9.6±3.0)mmol/L,GluSD:(3.61±1.68)mmol/L vs.(2.52±0.84)mmol/L,GluCV:0.328±0.120 vs.0.245±0.061,all P<0.05],but no significant difference in the levels of GluMV.When ROC was applied,and the area under the curve (AUC)of GluCV were 0.710±0.044,which was higher than that of GluSD,GluAdm and GluMV(0.692±0.045,0.570±0.046 and 0.506±0.047,all P<0.05).Conclusions Glucose variability is closely related with the mortality in critical ill patients,and GluCV is more valuable in predicting ICU mortality than GluAdm,GluMV and GluSD.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.141.35.52