检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中共黑龙江省委党校法学教研部,哈尔滨150001
出 处:《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》2011年第6期8-11,共4页Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law
摘 要:对原有宪法监督制度的创新与现行政权组织形式之间的矛盾,已经成为完善我国宪法监督制度过程中的一大障碍。对该问题的解决不能仅停留在制度设计的表层,必须展开理论层次分析,正确把握宪法监督模式与政权组织形式的关系。对我国而言,现有的宪法监督制度的低效状况急需改善,而无论是对宪法监督模式的重新选择还是对现有宪法监督模式的完善、对政权组织形式的适度调整都是不可避免的,同时又是极为必要的。The contradiction between the original constitution supervision system's innovation and the present political power organization configuration had become a big barrier in the consummate process of our country constitution supervision system.Cannot only pause to this question's solution in the system design surface layer,must launch the theory in analytic hierarchy,we should correctly master the relationships between the constitution supervision pattern and political power organization configuration.Speaking of our country,existing constitution control system's low efficiency condition urgently needs to been improved,it is inevitable and essential to chooses new constitution surveillance pattern,to improve existing constitution surveillance pattern,also to moderate adjust the political power organization configuration.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.195