我国量刑程序改革中的证据制度完善  

China's reform of the evidence in the sentencing process improvement system

作　　者：赵展[1] 刘旭东[2] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学研究生院刑事司法学院,北京100088 [2]黑龙江司法警官职业学院,哈尔滨150080

出　　处：《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》2011年第6期115-118,共4页Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law

摘　　要：在现代刑事司法中,定罪公正和量刑公正一起,构成了司法公正的丰富内涵。而目前,我国量刑不公的问题却日益凸显,随着我国法制建设的发展,学界与实务界也开始关注和研究量刑问题。但人们往往是从实体法的角度研究量刑,其实,量刑公正不仅是实体问题,更是一个程序问题。量刑程序的相对独立化是实现量刑公正的程序路径,但量刑程序的科学设置不仅仅是将传统的混合模式分离为相对独立的定罪程序和量刑程序,还要对量刑程序补充程序公正的要素。而针对量刑程序所设置的科学和完善的量刑证据证明规则体系正是保障程序公正的至关重要的一环。In the modern criminal justice,the conviction justice and sentencing justice form the Judicial justice's rich connotation.At present,China's problem of unfair sentencing has become increasingly prominent,along with the development of China's legal system,scholars and practitioners begin to focus on sentencing issues.But people often research sentencing from the perspective of the substantive law,in fact,the sentencing justice is not only a substantive issue,but also a procedural issue.Relatively independent of the sentencing process is the parh to achieve a fair sentencing procedure,but sentencing procedure is not only the scientific set of traditional mixed mode separation for relatively independent conviction procedure and sentencing procedure,but also add procedural justice's elements to sentencing procedure.The set of scientific and perfect sentencing evidences' prove rule system for sentencing procedure is just a vital part for protecting the procedural justice.

关 键 词：量刑证据 证明对象 证明规则 证明责任 证明标准 

分 类 号：DF03[政治法律—法学理论]