论我国数罪并罚制度之完善  

On Perfection of Combined Punishment of Crimes

作　　者：王小明 

机构地区：[1]浙江君问律师事务所,浙江丽水323400

出　　处：《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》2010年第4期39-42,共4页Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law

摘　　要：在我国司法实践中,数罪并罚制度因时间、程序、犯罪行为人个体差异等而产生不同并罚结果的现象屡见不鲜,这在本质上违背了刑法上的罪刑相当原则。该现象之所以产生并长期存在,主要是因为我国数罪并罚制度颇具多重缺陷。要解决此种缺陷,我国应当以刑罚目的论为引导,通过完善数罪并罚机制,并适度发挥法官自由裁量权,才能得以成就。In our judicial practice,Combined Punishment of Crimes often leads to different results because of persecution time,procedure and differences the individual criminals,which in essence obeys the Penalty Suitable Principle.The main reason of the existence of the phenomenon is multiple defects in Chinese Combined Punishment of Crimes.To resolve the defects,we objective should consider Penalty Teleology as the guide,improve the mechanism of Combined Punishment of Crimes,and endow judge appropriate discretion.

关 键 词：数罪并罚 刑罚目的论 罪刑相当原则 

分 类 号：D924.13[政治法律—刑法学]