检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李丽涓[1]
出 处:《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》2010年第6期41-45,共5页Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law
摘 要:犯罪构成是刑法理论的核心,也是刑法学科中举足轻重的基本范畴。近年来随着对国外犯罪构成理论的研究,许多学者提出我国犯罪构成理论存在缺陷并对其进行批判分析,提出改造与重构方案。与此同时也有学者提出我国犯罪构成理论的合理性和改造的不必要性的观点,对我国的犯罪构成理论进行了维护与坚持。通过对我国的犯罪构成理论体系和外国的犯罪构成理论体系进行比较研究,可以较为全面地透视中外犯罪构成理论体系的异同,从而为我们正确地认识中外犯罪构成理论体系的内在价值提供重要的参考。Constitution of crime is not only the core of criminal law theory,but also important category of basic criminal law subjects.In recent years,with the theoretical study of the theory constitution abroad,many scholars put forward flawed of our constitution crime theory and a critical analysis of its,proposed renovation and reconstruction programs; At the same time,some scholars put forward the view that the theory of Crime is reasonable and rebuilding it is not need,constitute crimes against our theory of the maintenance and persistence.Based on a comparative study between the theoretical system of our Crime and Crime Theory of Civil Law system,a more comprehensive perspective of the theoretical system of Chinese and foreign Crime similarities and differences,so for us to correctly understand the intrinsic value of theoretical system of Chinese and foreign crime constitutes have an important referencing value.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.19.244.133