检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谷艳辉[1]
出 处:《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》2012年第3期245-250,共6页Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
摘 要:《侵权责任法》的颁布实施为我国侵权责任法理论的发展提供了良好机遇。《侵权责任法》不仅明确了过错责任、过错推定责任、公平责任在物件损害责任中的适用,而且规定了各个物件损害责任的行为方式。但是在司法实践中,仅仅依靠法律条文是不够的,还需要一个科学合理的理论体系与之相融合。建议以物件损害责任的比较法研究为视角,在《侵权责任法》框架下,明确物件内涵与分类,完善物件侵权行为构成要件理论与公平补偿责任的司法解释。Tort Law provides a good opportunity for developing tort theories.This law not only determines the application of fault liability,fault presumption liability and fair liability to the liability for object damage,but also defines the way of act for each object damage liability.However,regulations alone are not adequate for judicial practices,and a scientific and rational theoretical system is also needed.From the perspective of comparative studies on the liability for object damage,this paper puts forward a proposal that in the framework of Tort Law it is a necessity to make clear object connotations and classifications,and to perfect the component theory of object tort and the judicial interpretation of fair compensation liability.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145