检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘洪涛[1] 马念杰[1] 刘鹏程[1] 连小勇[1]
机构地区:[1]中国矿业大学(北京)资源与安全工程学院,北京100083
出 处:《辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版)》2012年第2期172-175,共5页Journal of Liaoning Technical University (Natural Science)
基 金:国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)资助项目(2011CB201204);中央高校基本科研业务专项资金资助项目(2009QZ01;2011YZ06)
摘 要:针对巷道顶板高冒顶风险区域难以发现、识别的问题,采用力学建模、SURFER软件绘图与RFPA数值模拟相结合的方法,研究了稳定岩层层位与冒顶隐患级别的关系.结果表明:稳定岩层层位可以作为冒顶隐患级别分划的指标,根据稳定岩层层位的不同可以及时判断出高冒顶风险区域,2 m、4 m和6 m为级别变化的临界距离,稳定岩层距巷道顶板小于2 m时,冒顶隐患级别为Ⅰ级;稳定岩层距顶板2~4 m为Ⅱ级;稳定岩层在4~6 m为Ⅲ级;稳定岩层层位在6 m以上时,冒顶隐患级别为Ⅳ级,此类顶板是需要进行重点监测的区域.该成果对巷道顶板安全管理具有指导意义.In order to overcome the difficulty in identifying potential caving hazards in roadway roof,this study investigates the relationship between the levels of potential caving hazards and the situation of stable rock layer using the methods of mechanics modeling,SURFER mapping,and RFPA numerical simulation.The result shows that the position of stable strata could be a factor for classifying the levels of caving hazards.The high level caving hazards areas could be determined based on the different positions of stable rock layer.Critical values are 2 m,4 m and 6 m,where the level of caving hazards may vary.When the distance from the position of stable rock layer to the roadway roof is less than 2 m,the level of caving hazard is classified as ClassⅠ;when the distance is between 2 m and 4 m,the level is classified as Class Ⅱ;when the distance is between 4 m and 6 m,the level is classified as Class Ⅲ;when the distance is larger than 6 m,the level is classified as Class Ⅳ.In particular,the areas containing Class Ⅳ roofs should be monitored.These results provide some guidance for the safe management on roadway roof.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42