论法定危险状态出现之后能否成立中止犯  

The Problem of Whether There Is Discontinuation after the Emergence of a Legal Dangerous State

作　　者：周铭川[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学凯原法学院,上海200240

出　　处：《上海交通大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2012年第3期40-48,76,共10页Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金资助项目(10YJC820178)

摘　　要：在刑法同时规定"危险犯"和实害犯的犯罪中,对于在法定危险状态出现之后能否成立中止犯有多种学说,对于"危险犯"与实害犯之间是何关系也有多种观点。其实,行为人主观上有且只有一种犯罪故意,即针对实害犯的实害结果的直接故意,所谓"危险犯",并非独立的犯罪形态,仅是刑法为实害犯实现过程中出现的危险状态单独配置法定刑而已,其目的在于限制危险状态的刑罚适用,其同时适用于实害犯的未遂和中止。因此,尽管法定危险状态出现之后的中止本质上属于实害犯的中止,但只能在"危险犯"的法定刑幅度内酌情从轻处罚。In the crime of stipulated potential damage and actual damage simultaneously,there are various theories on the problem of whether there is discontinuation after the emergence of a legal dangerous state and on the relationship between the potential damage offense and the actual damage offense.In fact,because of the unique criminal intention which directs to the actual damage,the potential damage offense is not an independent criminal pattern but a provision of penalty which is to restrict the apply of penalty,including the attempted and the discontinued pattern of the actual damage offense.Therefore,although it is a discontinuation of the actual damage crime in nature,it can be punished according to the statutory sentence of the potential damage offense only.

关 键 词：危险犯 实害犯 危险状态 犯罪中止 

分 类 号：D924.1[政治法律—刑法学]