检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海理工大学环境与建筑学院,上海200093
出 处:《水资源与水工程学报》2012年第2期146-150,共5页Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering
摘 要:2011年8月对上海市12个公园中的13个湖泊水体进行了调查。对综合水质指数中各单因子水质标识指数的权重进行了改进与选择,根据调查资料,采用综合水质标识指数法对被调查水体的水质状况及营养状态进行了评价,用评分法和综合营养状态指数法验证了综合水质标识指数法应用于湖泊富营养化评价中的合理性。结果表明:所调查的湖泊中,仅有15.4%的公园湖泊综合水质达到水环境功能区要求,处于富营养化状态的公园湖泊占53.8%,湖泊中TN和CODCr污染最严重,综合水质标识指数法简便易用,能全面反映水质状况,评价结果科学合理,适合在公园湖泊富营养化评价中推广使用。The thirteen lake water bodies in twelve parks in Shanghai were investigated in Aug.2011.The weights of the single water quality factor in the comprehensive water quality index have been improved and selected.The comprehensive water quality identification index method was used to evaluate the water quality nutrition status of the investigated water-bodies.The rationality of the comprehensive water quality identification index method applied to the lake eutrophication assessment was verified by scoring method and comprehensive nutrition state index method.The conclusion showed that only 15.4 % of the comprehensive water quality of the park lakes met the requirements of water environment function,the lakes bing in eutrophication status accounted for 53.8%.The most serious pollutants were total nitrogen and chemical oxygen demand.The comprehensive water quality identification index method was simply used and can fully reflected the status of the water quality,the evaluation results were scientific and reasonable,it is appropriate for application to the eutrophication evaluation in park lakes.
分 类 号:X824[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117