检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:金三丽[1] 庞冬[1] 杨萍[1] 胡晶敏[2] 王晓玥[2] 张卨[2] 耿妍[2] 路潜[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学护理学院内外科护理学教研室,北京100191 [2]北京大学护理学院
出 处:《中国血液净化》2012年第2期81-84,共4页Chinese Journal of Blood Purification
摘 要:目的比较肾移植患者与腹膜透析患者的生活质量。方法采用病例对照的研究方法,以性别、年龄、文化程度、工作与否、付费方式、肾替代治疗时间作为匹配条件,选择肾移植和腹膜透析患者各58例,以健康相关生活质量问(Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire,SF-36)评估其生活质量。结果肾移植与腹膜透析患者的生理综合得分和精神综合得分均无显著性差异,在涉及的8个维度中,肾移植患者的生理机能(t=3.060,P=0.003)、一般健康状况(t=2.579,P=0.011)和精力(t=2.610,P=0.011)高于腹膜透析患者,而生理职能(Z=3.917,P=0.000)低于腹膜透析患者。结论肾移植与腹膜透析患者总体生活质量无差异,仅个别维度有差异;良好的疾病管理能改善患者生活质量,应加强肾替代治疗患者的管理。Objective To compare the quality of life between renal transplantation (RT) and peritoneal dialysis(PD) patients.Methods A case-control study was used,matching sex,age,education level,employment,means of payment and renal replacement therapy duration in two groups.58 pairs were selected to fill out Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire(SF-36) which was used to evaluate their quality of life.Results There were no significant differences in physical component summary and mental component summary between two groups.Physical functioning (t=3.060,P=0.003),general health (t=2.579,P=0.011) and vitality (t=2.610,P= 0.011) of RT patients were higher than those of PD patients,whereas role-physical(Z=3.917,P=0.000) was lower than PD patients.Conclusions There was no significant difference in total quality of life between two groups.High-quality disease management would benefit to improve the quality of life.We should pay more attention to the disease management,especially for RT patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15