检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]重庆电子工程职业学院体育教研室,重庆401331 [2]西南大学体育学院,重庆400715
出 处:《西南师范大学学报(自然科学版)》2012年第12期152-155,共4页Journal of Southwest China Normal University(Natural Science Edition)
摘 要:运用文献资料、录像观察和数理统计法,对2011年全国男子跳水锦标赛决赛成绩进行客观性分析,结果表明:男子3米双人跳板和10米双人跳台项目技术裁判评判的一致性较差,评分标准不一致,区分度不高;除男子3米双人跳板和10米双人跳台项目的技术裁判外,其它各项裁判员的评分一致性较高,评判标准较一致,评分尺度相对把握较好.By means of literature study,video observation and mathematical statistics,analysis on objectivity of scoring in 2011 men's National Diving Championships.The result shows that men's synchronized 3 meter springboard and 10 meters of double platform project technology referees the poor consistency.Scoring standards inconsistent and differentiation degree is not high;In addition to men's double 3 meters springboard and 10 meters of double platform project technology referees out of court,The other judges of high consistency relatively consistent,evaluation criteria,scoring scale is relatively better grasp.By 2011,the men's National Diving Championships referee's objectivity analysis for diving scoring the objectivity of reference,Finally the judges more fair,objective,reasonable and scientific.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171