检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘旭[1]
机构地区:[1]山东电力工程咨询院有限公司,山东济南250013
出 处:《热力发电》2012年第7期1-3,8,共4页Thermal Power Generation
摘 要:风冷干式排渣系统在我国火力发电厂大中型机组中应用广泛。对某台超超临界1 000MW机组分别采用斗提机、两级输送、一步上仓3种风冷干式排渣工艺的技术经济性进行了分析。结果表明,两级输送工艺运行平稳,但投资费用最高;斗提机工艺配置设备最多,故障点多,维护工作量较大;一步上仓工艺设备配置简单,运行维护方便;一步上仓工艺与斗提机工艺投资费用基本相同。The air-cooling dry bottom ash handling systems are widely used for large-and medium-capacity units in our country.The techno-economic efficiency of three air-cooling dry bottom ash handling technologies,namely bucket elevator method,two-stage conveying method,and one-step into bunket method,used separately to one ultra-supercritical 1 000 MW unit has been analysed.Results show that the two-stage conveying method can be stable in operation,but the capital investment is the highest;the bucket elevator method has too much equipments to be allocated,may have many fault points,boasting larger amount of reqair and maintenance work;the one-step into bunker method has simple equipment,being convenient in operation and maintenance,and its capital investment being basically the same with that in the bucket elevator method.
关 键 词:1 000 MW机组 干式排渣 两级输送 斗提机 一步上仓 投资费用
分 类 号:TK277[动力工程及工程热物理—动力机械及工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28