检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]长江科学院水力学研究所,湖北武汉430010 [2]河海大学水利水电学院,江苏南京210098 [3]长江科学院空间信息技术应用研究所,湖北武汉430010
出 处:《人民长江》2012年第21期79-81,共3页Yangtze River
摘 要:针对某水电工程泄洪量大、单宽流量大、佛氏数低且河床易冲刷的特点,采用水工模型试验的方法对底流消能工、宽尾墩底流消能工、跌坎底流消能工及宽尾墩-跌坎底流消能工4个方案的消能效果进行了对比研究。结果表明,宽尾墩-跌坎底流消能工方案在典型工况下消能充分,出池水流衔接平顺,对下游河床冲刷较轻。详细介绍了4个消能方案的布置形式和试验过程,可为同类工程参考。In light of a hydropower station that is characterized by large flood and unit-width discharges,small Froude number and easily scoured of river bed,4 energy dissipation schemes of bottom flow energy dissipater,bottom-flow energy dissipater of flaring gate pier,bottom-flow energy dissipater of drop sill and bottom-flow energy dissipater of flaring gate pier and drop sill are designed and their energy dissipation effectiveness are compared and researched by hydraulic model test.The test results show that under typical operation condition,for the bottom flow energy dissipater of flaring gate pier and drop sill,the effectiveness is the most obvious,the scouring to the downstream river channel is lighter and the transition flow at outlet is smooth.It gives a detail presentation to the layout and test process of 4 schemes,which can be referred for similar projects.
分 类 号:TV653[水利工程—水利水电工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28