新世纪诗歌批评:那些“繁荣”假面下的失效命名  

Poetry Criticism in the New Century: Failure of Naming under the Mask of "Prosperity"

作　　者：刘洁岷[1] 

机构地区：[1]江汉大学学报编辑部,湖北武汉430056

出　　处：《长沙理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2012年第5期47-51,共5页Journal of Changsha University of Science and Technology：Social Science

摘　　要：那些以70后、80后乃至90后为命名对象的文论、论坛(会议)、选本越是"厚重"、"丰繁"、"重要",就会对其中默默耕作的个体形成越大的遮蔽。这些被遮蔽的70后个体的作品量与质都早已不是、绝不是初学者,而是已经上了几个台阶的新一代诗人,目前已进入稳定、创作成绩不断增长的状态。但他们在多种百人左右的70后诗人选本里是绝迹的,在数以百计的关于70后诗人作品研究、批评文章里是稀有乃至绝迹的。以他们的杰出,以他们对本真诗歌写作的追求,我困惑于我们当代诗歌的研究与传播现状。由此,笔者不得不怀疑我们的整个诗歌传播、诗歌批评行业的"可持续性"以及其伦理基础。The more flourishing and important the forums,and the heavier the poetic criticism and poetry anthologies,named after the Post-70s,Post-80s and Post-90s,the more possible they will cast a shadow on the individual poets who are writing silently.From the quality and quantity of their poems,we can see that the individual poets of the Post-70s who are under the shadow of the poet groups of Post-70s are no more initial learners of poetry-writing.Instead,they are the poets of a new generation who are now in a stable creative condition of poetry-writing.In spite of their excellence and sincerity of pursuing the genuine essence of poetry,the individual poet of Post-70s are not included in many poetry anthologies which usually cover a wide range of Post-70 poets of about more than 100.Neither are these poets included in the poetry criticism about the Post-1970 poetry.Puzzled with the study and dissemination of the contemporary poetry,the author has to suspect the 'sustainability' of the poetry dissemination and criticism as well as their ethical basis.

关 键 词：70后诗群 诗歌传播 批评伦理 

分 类 号：I207[文学—中国文学]