检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《黑龙江医药》2012年第5期683-685,共3页Heilongjiang Medicine journal
摘 要:目的:比较宫腔镜电切术(TCRC)与宫颈环形切除术(LEEP)治疗难治性宫颈炎的临床疗效。方法:我院2011年3月~2012年3月间,门诊就诊的难治性宫颈炎患者280例,随机分为两组,每组140人,分别采用宫腔镜电切术(TCRC组)与宫颈环形切除术(LEEP组)进行治疗。结果:TCRC组的术中出血量明显少于LEEP组,两组手术时间无明显差异。术后两组出血时间无明显差异,而痂皮脱落出血量TCRC组明显少于LEEP组,两组有统计学差异。结论:TCRC与LEEP是治疗难治性宫颈炎的两种有效方法,TCRC出血少于LEEP组,而LEEP方法简便,更易于掌握。Objective:To compare the therapeutic effects of transcervical resection(TCRC) and loop electrical excision procedure(LEEP) for the treatment of hard-treated chronic cervicitis.Methods:From March 2011 to March 2012,totally 280 patients with hard-treated chronic cervicitis were randomly divided into two groups to receive TCRC or LEEP.Results:The intraoperative blood loss in the TCRC group was significantly less than that in the LEEP group.Whereas,no significantly differences were found in the.operation.time and in the bleeding time after operation.The afteroperative blood loss in the TCRC group was significantly less than that in the LEEP group.Conclusion:Both TCRC and LEEP are effective for hard treated chronic cervicitis,the blood loss in TCRC is less than in LEEP,however the latter is easier to perform than the forth.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229