宫腔镜电切术与宫颈环形切除术治疗难治性宫颈炎的临床分析  

Clinical Analysis of Transcervical Resection and Loop Electrical Excision Procedure for Treatment of Hard-treated Chronic Cervicitis

作　　者：袁丽萍[1] 张曙萱[1] 

机构地区：[1]江苏省徐州市第一人民医院,221002

出　　处：《黑龙江医药》2012年第5期683-685,共3页Heilongjiang Medicine journal

摘　　要：目的:比较宫腔镜电切术(TCRC)与宫颈环形切除术(LEEP)治疗难治性宫颈炎的临床疗效。方法:我院2011年3月～2012年3月间,门诊就诊的难治性宫颈炎患者280例,随机分为两组,每组140人,分别采用宫腔镜电切术(TCRC组)与宫颈环形切除术(LEEP组)进行治疗。结果:TCRC组的术中出血量明显少于LEEP组,两组手术时间无明显差异。术后两组出血时间无明显差异,而痂皮脱落出血量TCRC组明显少于LEEP组,两组有统计学差异。结论:TCRC与LEEP是治疗难治性宫颈炎的两种有效方法,TCRC出血少于LEEP组,而LEEP方法简便,更易于掌握。Objective:To compare the therapeutic effects of transcervical resection(TCRC) and loop electrical excision procedure(LEEP) for the treatment of hard-treated chronic cervicitis.Methods:From March 2011 to March 2012,totally 280 patients with hard-treated chronic cervicitis were randomly divided into two groups to receive TCRC or LEEP.Results:The intraoperative blood loss in the TCRC group was significantly less than that in the LEEP group.Whereas,no significantly differences were found in the.operation.time and in the bleeding time after operation.The afteroperative blood loss in the TCRC group was significantly less than that in the LEEP group.Conclusion:Both TCRC and LEEP are effective for hard treated chronic cervicitis,the blood loss in TCRC is less than in LEEP,however the latter is easier to perform than the forth.

关 键 词：宫腔镜 宫颈环形切除术 宫颈炎 

分 类 号：R711.32[医药卫生—妇产科学]