检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]内蒙古电力勘测设计院,内蒙古呼和浩特010020 [2]西安电子科技大学,陕西西安710071 [3]内蒙古送变电有限责任公司,内蒙古呼和浩特010020
出 处:《电网与清洁能源》2012年第7期75-78,共4页Power System and Clean Energy
摘 要:以内蒙古地区某风电场风资源分析为例,探讨采用常规的16风向扇区风速相关方法和简化后的8风向扇区和4风向扇区方法对代表年风速的订正所产生的误差情况,结果表明:4风向扇区风速相关性优于8风向扇区风速相关性,两者又都优于16风向扇区风速的相关性;采用4风向扇区和8风向扇区风速相关性进行修正得到的代表年月平均风速的结果与16风向扇区风速的相关性进行修正得到的代表年月平均风速的结果一致。Based on the assessment of the wind resources in a certain wind farm in Inner Mongolia,this paper presents an error analysis on revising the representative wind speed by the conventional 16-sector wind direction relation method and by the simplified 8-sector and 4-sector wind direction relation method,respectively.It is found that the wind speed relation of 4 wind direction sectors is superior to that of 8 wind direction sectors,while both are superior to that of 16 wind direction sectors.The revisited result of the representative monthly average wind speed obtained by the 4-sector and 8-sector wind direction relation methods is consistent with the revised data obtained by the 16 wind direction sectors relation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145