滥用知识产权市场支配地位的反垄断违法认定  

Studies on Defining Illegality of Abuse of Dominant Position of Intellectual Property Rights in Anti-Monopoly Law

作　　者：龙柯宇[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川外语学院国际关系学院,重庆400031

出　　处：《四川理工学院学报（社会科学版）》2012年第6期59-67,共9页Journal of Sichuan University of Science & Engineering(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：德国赛德尔基金会(Hanns-Seidel-Stiftung)联合培养博士资助项目(留金欧[2010]6003)

摘　　要：拥有知识产权的事实不应被假定为具有市场力量,但其拥有和行使却可能构成滥用市场支配地位。应将"滥用知识产权市场支配地位"界定为:具有市场支配地位的知识产品生产者不正当的利用其市场支配地位,从事扭曲了竞争秩序并减损消费者福利而应为反垄断法规制的不当行为。在对本身违法原则和合理法则等违法认定原则于知识产权反垄断实践中的不同适用情形进行比较和权衡的基础上,认为,应该适用和推广一元序列的判定模式,对具体之知识产权市场支配地位滥用行为进行分层次考察,使本身违法原则和合理法则相容于一个单一的分析过程之中。This article explores the dominant position of intellectual property rights(IPR) and its abuse.In practice,the idea should be held tightly that 'holding IPR does not mean holding the dominance'.But the holding and utilization of IPR may abuse the concept of its market dominance.In other words,only when a party abuses the market dominance of IPR and harms the competition,he can be governed by the antitrust law.Apart from that,the researcher also summarizes the legal characteristics of that abuse,compare,and balance the different applicable conditions of the two illegal judge principles: per se rule and reasonable rule.At last,the one dimensional series judge mode should be adopted and promoted.

关 键 词：滥用知识产权 市场支配地位 本身违法原则 合理法则 反垄断法 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学]