检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:范晓宇[1]
机构地区:[1]中国计量学院法学院,副教授法学博士杭州310018
出 处:《浙江社会科学》2013年第5期65-69,157,共6页Zhejiang Social Sciences
基 金:"浙江省高校人文社科重点研究基地--标准化与知识产权管理";浙江省"之江青年社科学者行动计划"(T12)资助
摘 要:对于专利复审委员会的决定是否得以请求国家赔偿责任,现行规定并不明确,学界亦未充分关注。依《国家赔偿法》第2条规定的国家赔偿构成要件,专利复审委员会完全有可能承担国家赔偿责任。《国家赔偿法》规定的"本法规定"的限定性要件、专利复审委员会行政行为的类司法裁判性质以及学说上主张的国家赔偿过错归责原则等并不足以构成否定其国家赔偿责任的理由。在专利复审委员会国家赔偿责任的限定上,直接损失说并不科学,而应采纳违法性限定说。Whether the Patent Re-examination Board should be requested state compensation for its decision, there is no clear provision in the existing law system. According to the Article 2 of State Compensation Law, it is perfectly possible that the Patent Re-examination Board undertakes state compensation. The finite elements of the provisions hereof stipulated by State Compensation Law, the quasi-judicial adjudication character of the administrative actions played by the Patent Re-examination Board as well as the state compensation fault liability principle claimed by theories are insufficient to deny the state compensation responsibility. It should adopt the limited illegitimacy theory to conclude the limit of Patent Re-examination Board's state compensation responsibility, but not the direct loss theory.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46