检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王春福[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江工商大学公共管理学院,教授。杭州310018
出 处:《浙江社会科学》2013年第7期60-65,119+157,共8页Zhejiang Social Sciences
基 金:浙江省哲学社会科学重点研究基地浙商研究中心课题成果;教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目(批准号:11YJA810002)的阶段性成果
摘 要:公共政策议程是公共政策运行的首要环节,在公共政策运行过程中发挥着筛选、启动和导向等功能。由于公共政策体制和运行机制上的差异,公共政策议程建立过程中形成了不同的模式。协同回应模式已经成为当今我国公共政策议程的重要模式。协同回应模式是多元互动、整体协同和有效回应的统一。它实现了政策需求和政策供给的统一、社会议程和政府议程的统一、政策工具和政策价值的统一。它也带来滞后效应、碎片效应和屏蔽效应等负效应。为了弱化其负效应。必须把滞后的回应性议程、超前的规划性议程和长远的制度性议程有机结合起来,才能进一步提升公共政策的有效性。Agenda is the most important part of public policy operation. It plays the role of screening, starting and orienting. Due to the differences between the system and operational mechanism of public policy, different modes have formed during the process of public policy agenda establishment. Collaborative response mode, which has become an important mode of China's public policy agenda today, is the unity of multiple interactions, overall coordination and effective response. It implemented the unity of policy needs and policy supply, the unity of social agenda and government agenda as well as the unity of policy instruments and policy value. However, it also brought the negative effects of lag, fragmentation and shielding. In order to weaken its negative effects, it is necessary to combine lag response agenda, ahead programmatic agenda and long-term institutional agenda organically, in that way, the effectiveness of public policy can be further enhanced.
分 类 号:D630[政治法律—政治学] F832.1[政治法律—中外政治制度]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222