检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李建锋[1] 罗沛宏[1] 贺晓龙[1] 史福胜[1]
出 处:《青海大学学报(自然科学版)》2013年第1期24-26,53,共4页Journal of Qinghai University(Natural Science)
基 金:青海省科技厅资助项目(2009-N-501)
摘 要:为了评价3种消毒剂的抑菌效果,从湟中县某牛羊育肥场随机选取3个圈舍,以大肠杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌为目标菌,分别对每个圈舍消毒前后进行采样和菌落计数。结果表明,84消毒液的消毒效果最好,强力消毒灵次之,1+1消毒液最差。综合来看,可首选84消毒液,并结合间隔性地使用不同的消毒剂,以减少微生物的耐受性。To evaluate the inhibitory effect of 84 disinfectant,strong disinfection and 1+1 disinfectant,we randomly selected three sheds from one of cattle and sheep feedlot in Huangzhong.The Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus were selected for target bacteria.Each shed were sampled and counted colony before and after disinfecting.The results showed that the disinfection effect of 84 disinfectant was best,strong disinfection was good,1+1 disinfectant was worst.The pollution of the three sheds is serious,microorganisms categories are various,comprehensive the effect of three kinds disinfectant,suggestion for the farmer use 84 disinfectant and use of different disinfectants at intervals to reduce microbial tolerated.
关 键 词:育肥羊 84消毒液 1+1消毒液 强力消毒灵 抑菌效果
分 类 号:S858.23[农业科学—临床兽医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49