切开引流挂线术与切开引流术治疗肛周脓肿的对比研究  

Incision and Drainage of Hanging Line and Incision and Drainage in the Treatment of Perianal Abscess

作　　者：黄卫新[1] 

机构地区：[1]赣南医学院第三附属医院,江西赣州341000

出　　处：《黑龙江医学》2013年第9期805-806,共2页Heilongjiang Medical Journal

摘　　要：目的对比分析切开引流挂线术与切开引流术治疗肛周脓肿的临床疗效。方法选取我院于2010-06～2012-12间收治的86例肛周脓肿患者,将所有患者随机分为实验组与对照组,两组均为43例。实验组接受切开引流挂线术,对照组接受切开引流术,对比分析两组患者的临床疗效。结果实验组与对照组手术时间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),实验组创面愈合时间、形成肛瘘及脓肿复发的患者均少于对照组(P<0.05)。结论切开引流挂线治疗肛周脓肿的临床疗效优于切开引流术,患者恢复快,复发及形成肛瘘的风险低,值得推广。Objective To compare and analyze incision and drainage thread and the clinical efficacy of open drainage in the treatment of perianal abscess.Methods Selecting 86 cases of perianal abscess patients in the hospital from June 2010 to December 2012.All the patients were randomly divided into experimental group and control group,with 43 cases in each group.The experimental group received incision and drainage,thread-drawing,the control group received incision and drainage.A comparative analysis of the clinical curative effect of two groups of patients was done.Results The operation time has no significant difference between the experimental group and the control group(P > 0.05).Wound healing time,anal fistula and abscess formation in patients with recurrence in experimental group were lower than control group(P < 0.05).Conclusion The clinical curative effect is better than that of incision and drainage seton treatment of perianal abscess incision and drainage,with patients' quick recovery,and the formation of a lower risk of recurrence of anal fistula.So it is worthy of promotion.

关 键 词：切开引流挂线术 肛周脓肿 临床疗效 

分 类 号：R657.1[医药卫生—外科学]