从逻辑学角度对“后奥运时代”叫法的质疑分析——兼谈“后奥运”衍生概念的规范使用  

Logical Questioning about the Term of “Post-Olympic Time”:with Reference to the Normative Use of the Concepts Derived from “Post-Olympic”

作　　者：邱雨[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南财经政法大学,河南郑州450002

出　　处：《中州体育（少林与太极）》2012年第1期19-22,共4页

摘　　要：运用文献资料法,对"后奥运时代"这一叫法的来源及概念本身进行了阐释,并对其他"后奥运"衍生概念的规范使用进行了讨论。"后奥运时代"这个叫法直接来源于"后现代"思潮在中国的涌动。从逻辑角度来看,这一叫法的错误之处在于其外延过大了,并根据加多概念内涵从而减少外延的方法,提出用"后08奥运时代"一词来替换"后奥运时代",并对其他"后奥运"衍生概念进行了相同的替换。但另有"后奥运效应"及其类似叫法,它们已经成为专业术语,其使用是科学的。Consulting relevant literature,this paper expounds the term of 'Post-Olympic Time' explores its origin,and discusses the normative use of other concepts derived from the term of 'Post-Olympic'.The term of 'PostOlympic Time' arises directly from the thought of post-modernism surging in China.From the logical point of view,the term has too large a denotation.The author puts forward the term of 'Post 2008 Olympic Time' in place of 'PostOlympic Time' by expanding its connotation while reducing its denotation and replaces other derived concepts accordingly.However,terms like 'Post-Olympic Effect' and its similar have become widely accepted and therefore scientific.

关 键 词：“后奥运时代” 逻辑学 质疑 后“08奥运”时代 

分 类 号：B812[哲学宗教—逻辑学]