检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]福建省福州市疾病预防控制中心,福州350004 [2]福建医科大学公共卫生学院,福州350005
出 处:《健康教育与健康促进》2011年第3期191-192,200,共3页Health Education and Health Promotion
摘 要:目的了解福州市医院的控烟现状及评价创建无烟医疗单位的效果。方法采用现场观察记录法,评价控烟效果。结果医院禁烟宣传率为83.3%,禁烟标识普及率为79.4%,非工作人员吸烟发现率为3.1%,工作人员吸烟发现率为0.3%,吸烟劝阻率为15.0%,烟头发现率为24.0%;无烟医院禁烟标识普及率高于非无烟医院(χ2=34.338,P<0.05),有禁烟标识的场所的吸烟发现率比无禁烟标识场所低(χ2=4.734,P<0.05),有禁烟标识场所烟头发现率低于无禁烟标识场所(χ2=61.22P<0.05),无烟医院烟头发现率低于非无烟医院(χ2=7.590,P<0.05)。结论无烟医院的控烟措施及吸烟现状均好于非无烟医院,应加大创建无烟医院的力度。Objective To study smoking situation and to evaluate the effect of establishing smoking-free hospital in Fuzhou.Methods By observation and recording on the spot,the smoke-control effect was evaluated to compare the difference in smoking status.Results In hospitals,no-smoking advertising rate was 83.33%.No-smoking sign recognition rate was 79.4%.The rate of smoking found in hospital was 3.1% for non-working staff and 0.3% for working staff.Smoking discouraging rate was 15%.Cigarette butt finding rate was 24%.In addition,the No-Smoking sign recognition rate was higher in smoking-free hospitals than that in regular hospitals(χ2=34.338,P<0.05).With No-Smoking sign posted,both the smoking rate(χ2=4.734,P<0.05) and the cigarette butt finding rate(χ2=61.22,P<0.05) were lower.It was also true that the cigarette butt finding rate was lower in smoking-free hospitals than that in regular hospitals(χ2=7.590,P<0.05).Conclusion The smoking-related problems in smoking-free hospitals are less severe than those in the regular hospitals.As a result,it is highly recommended to establish more smoking-free hospitals.
分 类 号:R197.3[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.195