检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:温金锁[1] 姚乐毅[1] 戚玉琴[1] 刘传耀[1] 杨彪[1]
机构地区:[1]陕西省宝鸡市疾病预防控制中心,宝鸡721006
出 处:《健康教育与健康促进》2013年第5期354-356,共3页Health Education and Health Promotion
摘 要:目的了解宝鸡市医疗卫生机构控烟干预情况,评价干预效果。方法采用问卷调查的方法,抽样调查了宝鸡市县乡医疗和公共卫生机构的医生关于烟草相关知识的认知和行为,对比分析干预前后的调查结果,评价综合干预措施取得的效果。结果干预前后吸烟率分别是30.0%和23.1%,被动吸烟率分别是78.3%和73.0%;烟草知识认知情况有了较大提高。干预前后的吸烟率和被动吸烟率下降明显,有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论采用健康教育与健康促进策略对医疗卫生单位实施控烟综合干预,较单纯的健康教育方法效果更理想。Objective To investigate and evaluate the intervention effect of tobacco control in the medical and health institutions in Baoji city.Methods By sampling,the doctors were selected and a survey was conducted with questionnaires in the medical and public health institutions in Baoji.The result data of their tobacco knowledge,attitude and practice(KAP) were analyzed before and after intervention by comparison.Effect evaluation was made of the comprehensive intervention.Results Before and after the intervention,the smoking rate was 30% and 23.1% respectively,and the passive smoking rate 78.3% and 73% respectively.Both rates decreased significantly.The differences were significant(P<0.05).Conclusion It is more effective to carry out the tobacco control intervention according to the health education and health promotion strategies in medical and health institutions than simple method of health education.
分 类 号:R195[医药卫生—卫生统计学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.218.243.199