检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:农凤秋[1]
出 处:《黑龙江医学》2013年第12期1207-1208,共2页Heilongjiang Medical Journal
摘 要:目的 对比观察不同方式静脉注射奥美拉唑治疗小儿上消化道出血的效果。方法 将我院2008-01~2012-12间收治的96例小儿上消化道出血患儿随机分为两组,研究组给予奥美拉唑持续静推治疗,对照组给予常规间歇静滴奥美拉唑治疗,评定两组患儿疗效。结果 研究组患儿治疗总有效率显著高于对照组,再出血率显著低于对照组,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论 与常规间歇静滴奥美拉唑比较,持续静推奥美拉唑治疗小儿上消化道出血疗效较好,不易复发,值得临床应用。Objective To compare and observe the effect of different ways of intravenous omeprazole treatment of children with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Methods 96 children with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding admitted to the hospital from January,2008 to December,2012 were randomly divided into two groups: the study group was given continuous omeprazole bolus therapy,and the control group was given conventional intermittent intravenous omeprazole therapy. The efficacy of two groups of children was assessed. Results The total effective rate of children of the study group was significantly higher than the control group,( P < 0. 01). Conclusion Compared with conventional intermittent intravenous omeprazole,continuous bolus treatment of children with upper gastrointestinal bleeding omeprazole has good effect with less recurrence,so it is worthy of clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.114.211