我国刑法第十三条但书与违法阻却事由之比较  

Comparison Between the 13th Article of Criminal Law of China and the Justifiable Cause of Continental Law System

作　　者：郎士超[1] 杨丽华 

机构地区：[1]黑龙江省政法管理干部学院,哈尔滨150080 [2]黑龙江省五常市人民法院,哈尔滨150000

出　　处：《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》2013年第4期52-54,共3页Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law

摘　　要：大陆法系刑法相关的出罪理论在我国刑法的犯罪论中如何定位、如何适用是困扰我国刑法学的难题。在没有确切定位的背景下,可以考虑用但书的立法规定对现实司法中需要救济的行为进行出罪尝试,用相关理论的具体内容作为"情节显著轻微危害不大"的构成要素。在但书与违法阻却事由方面进行比较,即但书与可罚的违法性理论、但书与正当化事由的比较、但书与主观违法要素三个方面进行比较,但书可以借鉴其相关理论。It is a problem for China's criminal jurisprudence that how to position and apply to the continental law system related decriminalizaion theory in Chinese criminal theory.Under the above background,we could consider to use the legislative provisions of the proviso to try to decriminalize for the need in real judicial relief,and use the specific content of related theory to form the constituent element of 'the minor offense with little harm'.Compared the proviso with the cause of preventing illegality,we could provide lessons to compare the punishable illegality theory and the justification and the subjective illegal elements with the proviso.

关 键 词：但书 大陆法系 出罪 司法适用 

分 类 号：DF61[政治法律—刑法学]