检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:雷良蓉[1]
机构地区:[1]湖北省随州职业技术学院医护学院,441300
出 处:《中国现代医药杂志》2012年第4期57-59,共3页Modern Medicine Journal of China
摘 要:目的评价社区护理干预对老年糖尿病治疗效果的影响。方法计算机检索PubMed、EMbase中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、万方数据库和中国期刊全文数据库,纳入老年糖尿病社区护理干预的随机对照实验,由2人独立进行数据提取和文献评价。采用RevMan5.0软件进行分析。结果共纳入6个RCT。Meta分析结果显示在血糖控制率[RR=4.07,95%CI(3.08,5.38),P<0.00001]、疾病知识掌握情况[RR=4.43,95%CI(3.26,6.03),P<0.00001]、遵医嘱率[RR=1.72,95%CI(1.31,2.24),P<0.0001]方面均具有统计学意义。结论 Meta分析显示社区护理干预对老年糖尿病的疗效优于传统护理方法。Objective To evaluate the curative effect of community nursing intervension for diabetes mellitus in olders by using the Meta-analysis. Methods The data bases of PubMed、EMbase,CBM,Wanfang Data,CNKI were searched. Into the old age community diabetes care intervention randomized controlled experiment by 2 independent data extraction and literature evaluation. Using RevMan5.0 software for analyzing. Results In 6 RCT Meta-analysis revealed in glycemic control rate[RR=4.07,95%CI(3.08,5.38),P<0.00001], disease knowledge[RR=4.43,95%CI(3.26,6.03),P<0.00001],compliance rate[RR=1.72,95%CI(1.31,2.24),P<0.0001] were statistical significance. Conclusion Meta analysis indicated that community nursing intervention on elderly diabetes is more effective than the traditional nursing method.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.69