指纹元素分析对南宋郊坛官窑的起源研究  

The Provenance research of Jiaotai Guan Kiln in Southern Song Dynasty by fingerprint element analyses

作　　者：赵维绢 高正耀[1] 陈松华[1] 姚桂芳 吴晓力 黄忠祥[3] 贾秀琴[3] 韩松[3] 

机构地区：[1]郑州大学物理工程学院,郑州450052 [2]杭州市文物考古所,杭州310008 [3]中国科学院高能物理研究所,北京100080

出　　处：《文物保护与考古科学》1998年第1期1-6,共6页Sciences of Conservation and Archaeology

基　　金：国家自然科学基金;中国科学院核分析技术开放实验室资助;河南省科技攻关资助

摘　　要：选取30个南宋官瓷样品、2个效坛官窑的原料、紫金土和4个现代仿官瓷样品进行中子活化分析（NAA），测定每个样品中36种微量元素的含量。从这36种元素中挑选出9种指纹元素的含量进行散布分析。结果表明：南宋官窑的釉料和胎料产地明显不同；南宋官窑有着长期稳定的釉料和胎料产地；遗址缸内的原料（35#）、练泥池内的原料（36#）、紫金土（37#）既不同于古官瓷的釉料，也不同于胎料。练泥地内的原料（36#）比较接近于胎料。现代官瓷的釉料和胎料与古官瓷的明显不同，说明它们的产地不同。It is analysed by neutron activation analysis (NAA) choosing thirty samples of South Song Guan porcelain, two original raw material from Jiaotan Guan kiln, Zijin clay and four modern imitations of ancient Guan porcelain. The 36 element contents in every sample are determined. It is studied using scatter analysis method that the nine finger print elements selected from this 36 elements. The result shows that the source of glaze raw material of South Song Guan porcelain is clearly different from that of the body raw material; the Guan kiln of South Song dynasty there was a very stable and lasting source of raw material of glaze and body; the original raw material inside the vat on the site, the original raw material inside the pit on the site, Zijin clay are different from not only the glaze material but also the body material, but the material inside pit being closer to the body material. The glaze material and body material of modern Guan porcelain are different from those of the ancient Guan porcelain, indicating that the source of material of modern Guan porcelain is different from that of ancient Guan porcelain.

关 键 词：南宋官瓷 中子活化分析 指纹元素 散布分析 

分 类 号：K85[历史地理—考古学及博物馆学]