检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:苏勇[1,2,3] 沈学顺[2,3] 彭新东[2] 李兴良[3] 伍湘君[3] 张爽 陈贤
机构地区:[1]南京信息工程大学大气科学学院,南京210044 [2]中国气象科学研究院灾害天气国家重点实验室,北京100081 [3]中国气象局数值预报中心,北京100081 [4]广州空军气象中心,广州510071
出 处:《大气科学》2013年第6期1309-1325,共17页Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences
基 金:"十二五"国家科技支撑计划2012BAC22B01;公益性行业(气象)科研专项GYHY201006013;国家自然科学基金项目41275103;国家自然科学基金创新研究群体科学基金项目4092103;江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划CXLX12_0491
摘 要:如何更好地模拟水物质的分布,对于数值天气预报效果的改进,特别是对于更好地模拟降水过程,具有重要的意义。半拉格朗日模式中的标量平流计算要求做到高精度、守恒、正定和保形,但GRAPES_GFS(Global-Regional Assimilation and PrEdiction System,Global Forecast System)中采用的QMSL(Quasi-Monotone Semi-Lagrangian)平流方案在水汽的强梯度、不连续区域计算精度较低,且不能做到严格守恒。本研究借鉴计算流体力学领域的研究进展,将一个基于分段有理函数的物质平流方案PRM(Piecewise Rational Method)引入GRAPES_GFS中,按照通量形式求解水汽方程,并对极区进行了混合等技术处理。通过一系列理想试验对两种平流方案进行了对比,证明了PRM方案精度较高,特别是在水汽梯度大的区域优势明显,频散、耗散误差较小,守恒、保形性也要好于QMSL方案。通过对GRAPES_GFS中批量预报试验效果的检验,验证了PRM方案可以有效地改进模式对水物质分布的模拟,提高了降水的预报效果,对模式综合预报性能的提升也有明显作用。Better simulation of the advection and distribution of moisture is highly significant for the improvement of numerical weather predictions, especially for precipitation. The computation of the advection process in a semi-Lagrangian model requires high accuracy, conservation of mass, positive and preserves the shape or spatial distribution of the advection quantity. However, the Quasi-Monotone Semi-Lagrangian(QMSL) scheme adopted in the Global-Regional Assimilation and PrEdiction System, Global Forecast System(GRAPES_GFS) suffers from lower accuracy in the strong gradient and discontinuity region of the scalar field and cannot strictly conserve the mass. This study draws on research progress in computational fluid dynamics; it introduces a material advection scheme, the Piecewise Rational Method(PRM), which is based on a piecewise continuous rational function, into the GRAPES_GFS,solves the flux form of the water vapor equation, and treats the polar regions with a mixing technique. The two advection schemes were compared in a series of stand-alone and in-model ideal tests. The results proved that the PRM scheme is more precise than the QMSL scheme; in particular, in the area of large water vapor gradient, the dispersion and dissipation error is smaller, and the conservation and shape preservation are also better. An examination of batch prediction experiments in the GRAPES_GFS verified that the PRM scheme can effectively improve the simulation of the advection and distribution of moisture, improve the accuracy of precipitation forecasts, and also play a significant role in enhancing the comprehensive model performance.
关 键 词:PRM方案 标量平流 GRAPES全球预报系统 半拉格朗日 质量守恒
分 类 号:P456[天文地球—大气科学及气象学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.242.128