检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李芹[1] 周文[1] 高虹 郑玲[1] 林世光 严争[3] 刘勤 林敦彬[3]
机构地区:[1]福州市传染病医院,福建福州350025 [2]福州儿童医院,福建福州350005 [3]福州市第一医院,福建福州350009
出 处:《福建中医药大学学报》2013年第4期7-10,共4页Journal of Fujian College of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基 金:国家中医药管理局中医药行业专项计划项目(200907001-3);福州市科技计划项目(2010-S-79)
摘 要:目的比较3种治疗方案对普通型手足口病的临床疗效。方法将200例普通型手足口病患儿分成中医组75例、西医组50例、中西医结合组75例,观察患儿的皮疹消退时间、热退时间及咳嗽、纳差、恶寒等症状消失时间。结果皮疹消退时间,中医组和中西医结合组显著少于西医组(P<0.05);咳嗽、纳差、恶寒等症状消失时间,中医组和中西医结合组显著少于西医组(P<0.05);在体温恢复正常方面,中西医结合组和西医组无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论中医药治疗手足口病在改善临床症状和减少并发症方面有一定优势。Objective To compare the clinical effects of three therapeutic regimens of common hand-foot-mouth disease(HFMD). Methods 200 common HFMD children were assigned to TCM group(n=75),western medicine group(n=75) and integrative medicine group(n=75). The time of deflorescence,and relief time of fever,cough,anorexia,chills and other symptoms of children were observed. Results The time of deflorescence in TCM group,integrative medicine group was shorter respectively than that of western medicine group(P<0.05),the relief time of cough,anorexia and chills were also shorter significantly than those of western medicine group(P<0.05),but there was not significant difference in relief time of cough between integrative medicine group and western medicine group. Conclusion Chinese medicines have some advantages in improving the clinical symptoms and reducing complications for treating HFMD.
分 类 号:R272[医药卫生—中医儿科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249