评章、骆主编的《中国文学史》──兼谈文学史编写中的理论与方法诸问题  

A Comment on "A Literary History of China":Problems of Theory and Methodology in Compiling Literary Histories

作　　者：宁宗一[1] 

机构地区：[1]南开大学东方艺术系

出　　处：《复旦学报（社会科学版）》1997年第1期38-44,109,共8页Fudan Journal（Social Sciences）

摘　　要：本文从“学院派”、当代意识、重建阅读空间、“指导思想”与文学史重构四个方面，充分肯定了章、骆二位教授主编的《中国文学史》是一部将历史的、审美的、心理的、道德的诸多因素融合起来，并激活当代读者新鲜智性、灵性和创造力的史的建构。它是对中国文学史的文化断裂的切实填补，又是打通文化壁垒和贯通传统与现代的一种拓展。本文虽肯定了“导言”积极的理论思考，但对文学历史发展过程的描述和文学史的建构是否应成为人性发展的证明，持怀疑的态度，并认为文学史的对象只能是人的心灵折射的文学的历史，但思想方法则可以是哲学的。所以仍主张回到文学史是人的心灵史的文学史观上来。This article,elucidating from four angles including academic focus,contemporary con-sciousness,restructuring 0f the reading-space,guiding principles and rewriting of the liter-ary history, regards 'A Literary History of China' written by both Professor Zhang and Professor Luo as a major work combining historical,aesthetic,psychological and moral fac-tors,and brings present readers fresh intelligence and creative ability. The book really fillsin the cultural gaps in the literary history of China,and connects the tradition and modern times across cultural barriers. The article affirms the positive theoretical thinking of theIntroduction,but expresses doubts whether the description of development of the literary history and structuring of a literary history should manifest the development of human na-ture. The article also proposes that literary history is nothing but a Teflection of the human soul although the method of thinking can be used philosophically. So the article still holdsthat the literary history is the history of human spirit.

关 键 词：文学史研究 《中国文学史》 理论与方法 当代意识 《三国演义》 文学史家 文学史重构 理论思考 人性 阅读空间 

分 类 号：G129[文化科学]