检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周锡山[1]
机构地区:[1]上海艺术研究所
出 处:《复旦学报(社会科学版)》1997年第5期57-62,110,共7页Fudan Journal(Social Sciences)
摘 要:本文认为复旦本《中国文学史》开创文学史研究的新局面,在学术上获得突出的新成就,应充分肯定,同时它的不足之处也值得探讨。中国哲学与文学的关系,佛教文化对中国文学的全面、重大的影响,充分全面吸收学术界新成果包括对科举制度的新认识和多角度、多层次体会和认识伟大作品的成就与意义,是20世纪文学史研究界普遍性地显得不足的局限,本书也未能避免。This essay points out that 'A Literary History China'(Fudan University Edition) has taken on a new aspect of studying literary history and gained excellent academic achievements which are to be fully recognized. But its deficiencies should be examined as well. In the field of studying the literary history of the 20th century,there are four common limitations,from which the present edition is not free,namely,inadequacies in dealing with (1) the relationship between Chinese philosophy and literature; (2) the all-round and important influence of Buddhist culture on Chinese literature; (3)how to fully absorb new academic achievements,including those in understanding the imperial examination system in a new light; and (4)how to appreciate the achievements and meanings of great works from different angles and in different depths.
关 键 词:文学史研究 《中国文学史》 科举制度 佛教文化 文学史著 新成果 汤显祖 《聊斋志异》 《儒林外史》 文学作品
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70