范晔之死及其文化象征意义  被引量:1

The Death of Fan Ye and Its Cultural Meaning

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:曹旭[1] 全亮[1] 

机构地区:[1]上海师范大学人文与传播学院,上海200234

出  处:《上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2014年第1期54-63,共10页Journal of Shanghai Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition)

基  金:国家社科基金项目成果(11BZW019);上海高校大文科学术新人培育计划阶段性成果

摘  要:出生于士族家庭的刘宋史学家、文学家——《后汉书》的作者范晔在元嘉年间死于非命,罪名是谋反。范晔确实参与了谋反。但范晔的谋反是被人诱导的,是中了刘义隆君臣设置的圈套。宋文帝刘义隆在消灭了著名士族文人谢灵运以后,又消灭了范晔这个狂傲不羁的士族代表;以达到打击士族,集中军权、分化相权、加强文化专制的一系列目的。作者通过分析范晔之死及其原因,揭示其文化象征意义。以范晔之死为标志,东晋以来士族与皇族分权的局面随之结束,此后的权力高度集中于皇帝。范晔之死,象征着皇权的胜利,也象征古典史学传统的没落。史学逐渐被纳入皇权的轨道,以往士族文人私修历史的局面被彻底改变。范晔死后,史学家通常只能奉旨修史。官史代替私史,逐渐成为中国史学的主流。Fan Ye,a historian and man of letters,was born into a literati family and the author of Book of Later Han Dynasty. The proud and unruly Fan Ye was killed on the accusation of treason in the Yuanjia Period by the emperor Liu Yilong who first killed Xie Lingyun,another famous man of letters. The death of Fan Ye symbolized the downfall of the classical tradition of historiography and the victory of the imperial power. After Fan Ye's death,the literati were deprived of their power and the centralization of the emperor's power was established. Unauthorized historiography was replaced by authorized historiography,and as a result,the literati were untitled to compile history.

关 键 词:范晔 刘义隆 士族 皇权 私史 

分 类 号:I206.09[文学—中国文学] G09[文化科学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象