检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:LI Miao1,2,LI XiaoDong2,3 & ZHANG Xin1,4 1Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics China,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China 2Key Laboratory of Frontiers in Theoretical Physics,Institute of Theoretical Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China 3Interdisciplinary Center for Theoretical Study,University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei 230026,China 4Department of Physics,College of Sciences,Northeastern University,Shenyang 110004,China
出 处:《Science China(Physics,Mechanics & Astronomy)》2010年第9期1631-1645,共15页中国科学:物理学、力学、天文学(英文版)
基 金:supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos 10705041,10821504, 10975032 and 10975172);the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No 2007CB815401)
摘 要:We compare some popular dark energy models under the assumption of a flat universe by using the latest observational data including the type Ia supernovae Constitution compilation,the baryon acoustic oscillation measurement from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey,the cosmic microwave background measurement given by the seven-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe observations and the determination of H0 from the Hubble Space Telescope.Model comparison statistics such as the Bayesian and Akaike information criteria are applied to assess the worth of the models.These statistics favor models that give a good fit with fewer parameters.Based on this analysis,we find that the simplest cosmological constant model that has only one free parameter is still preferred by the current data.For other dynamical dark energy models,we find that some of them,such as the αdark energy,constant w,generalized Chaplygin gas,Chevalliear-Polarski-Linder parametrization,and holographic dark energy models,can provide good fits to the current data,and three of them,namely,the Ricci dark energy,agegraphic dark energy,and Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati models,are clearly disfavored by the data.We compare some popular dark energy models under the assumption of a flat universe by using the latest observational data including the type Ia supernovae Constitution compilation,the baryon acoustic oscillation measurement from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey,the cosmic microwave background measurement given by the seven-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe observations and the determination of H0 from the Hubble Space Telescope.Model comparison statistics such as the Bayesian and Akaike information criteria are applied to assess the worth of the models.These statistics favor models that give a good fit with fewer parameters.Based on this analysis,we find that the simplest cosmological constant model that has only one free parameter is still preferred by the current data.For other dynamical dark energy models,we find that some of them,such as the αdark energy,constant w,generalized Chaplygin gas,Chevalliear-Polarski-Linder parametrization,and holographic dark energy models,can provide good fits to the current data,and three of them,namely,the Ricci dark energy,agegraphic dark energy,and Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati models,are clearly disfavored by the data.
关 键 词:DARK energy MODELS OBSERVATIONAL constraints model COMPARISON information CRITERIA
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42