世界主要医疗保障体系比较——对中国“医改”的启示  

Comparative Study of the Main Healthcare Systems in the World and Their inspirations to China

作　　者：杨易成[1,2] 杜纲[1] 刘国恩[3,2] 

机构地区：[1]天津大学管理学院 [2]北京大学中国医药经济研究中心 [3]北京大学光华管理学院

出　　处：《中国药物经济学》2008年第6期41-47,共7页China Journal of Pharmaceutical Economics

摘　　要：建立成功的医疗保障体系是一个世界难题,也是我国目前所面临的重大发展问题。为了更好地探索医疗保障体系的实质和便于比较世界上主要医疗体系的特点,本文分析了四种医疗保障风险分担机制,进而根据其特征将主要发达国家的医疗保障体系分为三类。通过分析这三类医疗保障体系的卫生费用构成并与中国的进行比较,得出针对中国医疗保障体系改革和发展的相应启示。The development of a successful healthcare system is a tough issue fronted by any nation in the world,the fast developing China is not an exception.The healthcare risk pooling systems are firstly analyzed in order to study the nature of healthcare systems as well as conduct comparisons between them.The healthcare systems in the developed countries are grouped into three categories according to the comparisons.After studying the proportions of the healthcare expenses in the three categories and in China,some inspirations are summarized that may be helpful to the development and reform of Chinese healthcare system.

关 键 词：医疗保障 风险分担 卫生费用 

分 类 号：R197.1[医药卫生—卫生事业管理] R199[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]