药物麻醉分析中的法律问题  

Legal problems on anaesthetization analysis

作　　者：曾建林[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院,100871

出　　处：《法律与医学杂志》2004年第2期144-146,共3页Journal of Law & Medicine

摘　　要：司法精神病鉴定中被鉴定人也享有沉默权。因为享有沉默权的主体包括所有公民 ,使用的时机是任何有可能导致被追究刑事责任的时候 ,沉默权的效果之一是禁止使用麻醉分析方法收集证据。因此所有在麻醉分析过程中获得的材料都不得被作为证据采纳。但是鉴定结论可以作为专家证据由法庭决定是否采纳。The appraised individual have the right to keep silence during the period of judicial appraisal of psychosis. All citizen have the right to keep silence when he/she is under the danger of being pursued to bear criminal responsibility. Prohibiting evidences collected under the condition of anaesthetization is one of the effect of the right to keep silence, so the materials obtained under the condition of anaesthetization was unaccepted as a evidence. However, whether acceptance the expertise conclusion, as a kind of expert evidence, is decided by the court.

关 键 词：药物麻醉分析 沉默权 司法精神病学 证据可采性 鉴定结论 

分 类 号：D919.3[医药卫生—法医学] D924.34[政治法律—法学]