三袖套法与经典血管吻合法在大鼠异位小肠移植中的应用比较  

Comparison of the tri-cuff and classical methods for vascular anastomosis in heterotopic small bowel transplantation in rats

作　　者：孙家乾[1] 李国新[1] 黄祥成[1] 邓海军[1] 余江[1] 

机构地区：[1]第一军医大学南方医院普外科,广东广州510515

出　　处：《第一军医大学学报》2004年第6期670-672,共3页Journal of First Military Medical University

基　　金：广东省自然科学基金(020047)~~

摘　　要：目的探讨三袖套血管吻合法行大鼠小肠移植的效果。方法将60只Wistar 大鼠作为受体随机分为实验组(30例)和对照组(30例),实验组给予三袖套法血管吻合法,对照组给予经典血管吻合法,比较两组手术效果。结果三袖套法血管吻合法的手术时间、动脉吻合时间、移植肠温缺血时间3项指标均优于经典血管吻合法。结论与经典血管吻合法比较,三袖套血管吻合法更安全、省时,值得推广。Objective To explore the effect of the tri-cuff vascular anastomosis for simplifying the surgical procedure and improving the success rate. Method Sixty recipient Wistar rats were randomized into experimental group and the control group, the former was subjected to the tri-cuff vascular anastomosis for heterotopic small bowel transplantation while the latter had vascular anastomosis using classical methods. The effects of the two methods for anastomosis were compared. Results The tri-cuff vascular anastomosis was superior to the classical methods in view of the total operation time, arterial anastomosis time, and hot-ischemia time of the small bowel graft. Conclusion Compared with the classical methods, the tri-cuff vascular anastomosis is safer and time-saving.

关 键 词：三袖套法 经典血管吻合法 小肠移植 应用比较 大鼠 

分 类 号：R656.7[医药卫生—外科学]